St. Petersburg Institute
of Foreign Economic Relations, Economics and Law (IFEREL)THE COURSE PAPER
On the Subject | “The Infinitive Constructions and The Ways of Their Using” |
By Academic Subject | The Practice and Theory of Translation of English |
Made by the student of | III-rd year | Kyosababyn Diana Rafaelovna |
The record-book | # | E-4112 |
Checked by:
The Head (Teacher)Badalyan L. A._________
Signature
Yerevan – 2005
The List of Contents
# | INDEX | Page # |
1. | The List of Contents. | – 3 |
2. | Introduction: The Non-Finite Forms of the Verbs. | – 4 |
3. | The Predicative Constructions with Non-Finite Forms of the Verbs. | – 6 |
4. | Body: The Predicative Infinitive Constructions. The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction. | – 7 |
5. | The Subjective-with-the-Infinitive Construction. | – 12 |
6. | The For-to-Infinitive Construction. | – 14 |
7. | The Absolute Infinitive Construction. | – 16 |
8. | Conclusion | – 17 |
9. | Bibliography | – 19 |
INTRIDUCTION
The words of every language fall into classes which are called Parts of Speech. Each part of speech has characteristics of its own. The parts of speech differ from each other in meaning, in form and in function.
One of the parts of speech is the Verb. According to content, the verb can be described as word denoting action (the term “action” embracing the meaning of activity (to walk, to speak, to play, to study), process (to sleep, to wait, to live), state (to be, to like, to know), relation (to consist, to resemble, to lack) and the like. According to form, it can be described as a word that has certain grammatical features that are not shared by other parts of speech; they have the category of tense, aspect, voice. According to the function, verb can be defined as a word making up the predicate of the sentence.
The English Verbs can be divided into two main groups, according to the function they perform in the sentence – the finite forms and non-finite forms.
The finite forms have the function of the predicate in the sentence and may also be called the predicate forms.
The non-finite or non-predicative forms can have various other functions. These forms are also called the verbals.
The non-finite forms or the verbals, unlike the finite forms of the verbs do not express person, number or mood. Therefore they cannot be used as the predicate of a sentence. Like the finite forms of the verbs the verbals have tense and voice distinctions, but their tense distinctions differ from those of the finite verb.
There are three verbals in English: the participle, the gerund, and the infinitive. In Russian there are also three non-finite forms of the verb, but they do not fully coincide with those in the English language (причастие, деепричстие, инфинитив).
In English the verbals have the following characteristic traits:
a) They have a double nature: nominal and verbal. The participle combines the characteristics of a verb with those of an adjective; the gerund and the infinitive combine the characteristics of a verb with those of a known.
b) The tense distinctions of the verbals are not absolute like those of the finite verbs, but relative. The form of a verbal does not show whether the action it denotes refers to the present, past or future. It shows only whether the action expressed by the verbal is simultaneous with the action expressed by the finite verb or prior to it.
In the sentence a verbal may occur.
a) singling (without accompanying words)
Eg. She went away smiling. – Онаушла, улыбаясь.
Readingisoutofquestion, Ican’tfixmyattentiononbooks. – О чтении не может быть и речиб я не могу сосредоточить свое внимание на книгах.
b) in phrase (i.e. with one or several accompanying words – an object or an adverbial modifier to the verbal). The phrases form syntactic units serving as one part of the sentence. A phrase should not be confused with a predicative construction. Between the elements of a phrase there is no predicate relation as it does not include a noun or pronoun expressed by a verbal.
Eg. Not to disquiet his sister, he had said nothing to her of the matter. – Чтобынетревожитьсестру, онничегонесказалейобэтом.
c) in predicative constructions.
Eg. She heard him open the door and go out the yard. – Онауслышала, каконоткрылдверьивышелводвор.
All the verbals can form predicative constructions. They consist of two elements: a nominal (noun or pronoun) and a verbal (participle, gerund or infinitive). The verbal element stands in predicate relation to the nominal element. That is to say it stands in the subject and the predicate of the sentence. It most cases predicative constructions form syntactic units, serving as one part of the sentence.
Eg. The sat down to supper, Jerry still talking cheerfully. – Ониселиужинать; Джерипродолжалвеселоразговаривать.
“Jerry still talking cheerfully” is a predicate relation to the noun Jerry, which denotes the doer of the action expressed by the participle.
Predicative Constructions with the
Non-Finite Forms of the Verb
The Non-Finite forms of the Verb are more simple and economical expressive means of thought.
Combinations of non-finite forms of the verb with a noun or pronoun standing a front of them form various grammatical constructions.
In English there are three non-finite forms of the verb: Participle, Gerund, and Infinitive. Therefore, there are three groups of predicative constructions. These are the constructions with Participle, Gerund, and Infinitive.
Participial, Gerundial and Infinitive constructions are highly varied. The structure of some of them is foreign to the Russian language, although their meaning can be fully conveyed in Russian with the help of forms, characteristic of Russian. The constructions are translated into Russian by objective, attributive, adverbial or other subordinate clauses.
eg. 1) My son having lost the key, we could not enter the house. – Посколькумойцынпотерялключ, мынемогливойтивдом. (Participle)
Here Participle is translated into Russian as the predicate of a subordinate clause.
2) Thereisnomistakeabouthisbeingagenius. – Не может быть никакого сомнения в том, что он – гений. (Gerund)
3) She heard him open the door and go out into the garden. – Онаслышала, каконоткрылдверьивышелводвор. (Infinitive)
My course paper aims at analyzing the Predicative Constructions with the Infinitive, the ways of translating them into Russian.
BODY
Predicative Infinitive Constructions
In Modern English we distinguish the following predicative constructions with the infinitive:
1. The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction
2. The Subjective-with-the-Infinitive Construction
3. The For-to-Infinitive Construction
4. The Absolute Infinitive.
I. The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction
The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction is a construction in which the Infinitive is in predicate relation to a noun in the common case or a pronoun in the objective case. In the sentence this construction has the function of a Complex Object. In translating the Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction into Russian there is always used a subordinate clause.
Eg. She is a wonderful teacher and I’ve never seen her lose her temper or get angry about anything. – Оназамечательнаяучительница, ияникогданевидела, чтобыонавышлаизсебяилирассердиласьиз-зачего-нибудь.
I believe him to know this subject well. – Япологаю, чтоонхорошознаетэтотпредмет.
I consider this question to be very important. – Ясчитаю, чтоэтотвопросоченьважен.
Although, sometimes a sentence containing The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction may be translated by a simple sentence.
Eg. The dread of the unknown made me recede (step back). – Страхпереднеизвестностьюзаставилменяотступить.
Hewon’tallowhimself dootherwise. – Он не позволит себе поступить иначе.
One’s gaze made me turn round. – Чей-топристальныйвзглядзаставилменяобернуться.
Hisparentslethimgotocountryexcursion. – Его родители позволили ему поехать на загородную экскурсию.
Shewillneverlethimleave. – Она никогда не позволит ему уйти.
The Use of the Objective Infinitive Construction
The Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction is used:
1. After verbs denoting sense perception, such as: “to hear”, “to see”, “to watch”, “to feel”, “to observe”, “to notice”, etc.
Eg. I haven’t heard anyone call me. – Янеслышал, чтобы
кто-нибудь меня звал.
IsawDavidentertheroom. – И видел, как Девид вошел в комнату.
After verbs of sense perception only the Indefinite Infinitive Active is used. If the meaning is passive Participle II is used.
Eg. I saw the fire slowly faded. – Явидел, какпожарпостепеннопотух.
If a process is expressed, Participle I Indefinite Active is used.
Eg. HesawWendycoming – Он увидел, как Венди идет.
It should be noted that the verb “to see” should be followed by a clause and not by the Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction, when it is used in the meaning of “to understand”.
Eg. I saw that he did not realize the danger. – Я видел (понимал), что он не осознает опасность.
After the verbs “to see” and “to notice” the Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction is not used with the verb “to be”. In such cases Subordinate Clause is used.
Eg. I saw, that he was pale. – Явидел, чтоонпобледнел.
When the verb “to hear” is not a verb of sense perception and is used in the meaning “to learn”, “to be told”, a clause or a gerund is used, but not the Objective-with-the-Infinitive Construction.
Eg. IheardthathehadleftforFrance. – Мне сказали (Я слышал), что он уехал во Францию.